• 国家药监局综合司 国家卫生健康委办公厅
  • 国家药监局综合司 国家卫生健康委办公厅

二种不同腔内血栓清除方式治疗早期下肢深静脉血栓的疗效分析—一个单中心回顾性分析

通讯作者: 孔祥耀, xykong0574@126.com
DOI:10.12201/bmr.202506.00037
声明:预印本系统所发表的论文仅用于最新科研成果的交流与共享,未经同行评议,因此不建议直接应用于指导临床实践。

Efficacy Analysis of Two Different Endovascular Thrombectomy Approaches for Treating Early-Stage Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

  • 摘要:目的:比较分析AngioJet机械性血栓清除与大腔导管抽吸系统治疗早期下肢深静脉血栓的临床疗效及安全性差异。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2024年10月宁波市医疗中心李惠利医院收治的88例接受机械血栓清除治疗的下肢深静脉血栓患者。根据手术方式分为AngioJet组(A组)和负压大腔导管组(B组),比较两组围术期指标(手术时长、住院时长)、血栓清除效果(即刻清除率、最终清除率)及术后并发症发生情况。结果:两组基线资料具有可比性(P>0.05)。手术成功率100%,两组患者在住院时长、手术时长、术后清除率、最终清除率上差异无统计学意义。并发症方面,A组血尿发生率显著高于B组,B组3例发生穿刺部位出血。结论:两种机械血栓清除方式在早期LEDVT治疗中均展现良好疗效,AngioJet机械血栓清除系统需警惕溶血相关肾损伤风险,建议加强围术期水化及肾功能监测;负压大腔导管存在穿刺点出血、操作繁琐、损伤静脉瓣膜等不足,经皮机械性血栓清除装置仍需不断改进创新。

    关键词: 机械性血栓清除,深静脉血栓

     

    Abstract: Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy and safety differences between AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy and large bore catheter aspiration systems in treating early deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 88 patients with deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs who received mechanical thrombectomy treatment at Li Hui Li Hospital, Ningbo Medical Center from January 2020 to October 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on surgical method: Group AngioJet (A group) and Group B (negative pressure large bore catheter group). The perioperative indicators (surgical duration, hospital stay), thrombus clearance outcomes (immediate clearance rate, final clearance rate), and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The baseline data of both groups were comparable (P>0.05). The success rate of surgery was 100%, and there were no statistically significant differences in hospital stay, surgical duration, postoperative clearance rate, or final clearance rate between the two groups. In terms of complications, the incidence of hematuria in Group A was significantly higher than in Group B, with 3 cases of puncture site bleeding in Group B. Conclusion: Both mechanical thrombectomy methods demonstrated good therapeutic effects in early LEDVT. The AngioJet mechanical thrombectomy system requires vigilance against the risk of hemolysis-related kidney injury, and it is recommended to enhance perioperative hydration and renal function monitoring. Large-bore negative pressure catheters have shortcomings such as puncture site bleeding, cumbersome operation, and venous valve damage. Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy devices still require continuous improvement and innovation.

    Key words: percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, deep vein thrombosis

    提交时间:2025-06-16

    版权声明:作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权,预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
  • 图表

  • 李鹏飞, 路鑫, 徐峰. 创伤后深静脉血栓形成的诊治进展. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202410.00015

    牛亚丹. 外周血炎症指标对髋部骨折患者术后并发下肢深静脉血栓的诊断价值. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202408.00016

    王元元. 基于CDSS的静脉血栓防治系统的构建与应用. 2021. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202107.00014

    刘昕颖, 何丽丽, 张洪庆, 罗琴▲. 肌间静脉血栓抗凝治疗的研究进展. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202507.00032

    朱东胜, 许俊杰, 高扬, 徐云峰, 王宝祥, 胡进. 急性前循环大血管闭塞脑卒中机械取栓术后颅脑CT可逆性缺血性水肿影像因素分析. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202503.00006

    索源, 孙辉. 电针联合抗血栓压力带对神经危重症高危VTE患者DVT的预防价值. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202503.00088

    许林敏, 陈新艳, 郭芳, 李玮, 陈海棠. 单孔腹腔镜术在卵巢囊肿治疗中的疗效观察. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202410.00071

    王珂婷, 杨迪, 何静, 严笑. 系统性红斑狼疮继发血栓性血小板减少性紫癜合并妊娠一例并文献复习. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202504.00053

    杨旭平, 高明暄. 经皮椎体成形术后邻近椎体再骨折的研究进展. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202504.00074

    兰艳纤, 陆海鹏, 吕聪, 曾雨歆, 罗秀. 利伐沙班在80岁及以上老年房颤患者抗凝治疗的有效性和安全性:单中心回顾性研究. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202412.00055

  • 序号 提交日期 编号 操作
    1 2025-06-03

    bmr.202506.00037V1

    下载
  • 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者

引用格式

孔祥耀, 吴泽涛. 二种不同腔内血栓清除方式治疗早期下肢深静脉血栓的疗效分析—一个单中心回顾性分析. 2025. biomedRxiv.202506.00037

访问统计

  • 阅读量:60
  • 下载量: 0
  • 评论数:0

Email This Article

User name:
Email:*请输入正确邮箱
Code:*验证码错误