通讯作者: 任明辉, renminghui@pku.edu.cn

DOI：10.12201/bmr.202604.00066

Indicator system for global health diplomacy competency

• 摘要：目的：构建适用于中国情境的全球卫生外交胜任力评价指标体系,明确指标权重,为全球卫生外交领域的能力测评、人才培养与课程设计提供依据。 方法：基于文献检索形成初始指标体系,开展两轮德尔菲咨询,使用优序图法计算并排序指标权重。 结果：形成涵盖6个一级、31个二级指标的全球卫生外交胜任力评价指标体系。其中,一级指标权重排序为:全球卫生核心知识理解与分析能力；时事政治环境分析能力；跨文化沟通与人际协作能力；外交技能；决策分析能力与领导力；伙伴关系建设与政策倡导能力；二级指标权重前五项为:外语沟通与国际会议文件写作能力；多边外交表达与立场传播能力；基于证据的政策决策影响能力；主要国家/地区卫生体系与筹资模式及中国参与全球卫生治理的理解能力；全球议题融入国际/国家政治议程能力。 结论：本研究构建的指标体系结构清晰、可操作性强,具备较好的专家一致性与权威性证据。相比于国际其他全球卫生外交胜任力和国内全球卫生人才胜任力指标体系,该体系突出中国特色和外交场域,能够为中国的全球卫生外交胜任力评估、课程与培训设计、岗位画像及绩效改进提供依据。建议未来在多机构和多场景中进一步开展信效度检验与动态更新,以确保其适应性与前瞻性。

  关键词： 全球卫生外交；胜任力；指标体系；德尔菲法; ; ; 

   

  Abstract: Objective: To construct an indicator system for global health diplomacy competency in Chinese context, determine the weighting of each indicator, and provide a basis for competency assessment, talent development, and curriculum design. Methods: An initial indicator system was formed through literature review. Subsequently, two rounds of Delphi email consultations were conducted, and the indicator weights were calculated and ranked using the Preference Ranking Method. Results: A final system comprising 6 primary indicators and 31 secondary indicators was established. The weighting order for primary indicators is as follows: Understanding and analytical skills regarding core global health knowledge; Analysis of current political and environmental contexts; Cross-cultural communication and interpersonal collaboration skills; Diplomatic skills; Decision-making analysis and leadership; Partnership building and policy advocacy. The top five secondary indicators by weight were: Foreign language communication and international conference document drafting; Multilateral diplomatic expression and position articulation; Evidence-based policy decision-making influence; Understanding of major countries/regions’ health systems, financing models, and Chinas participation in global health governance; Integration of global issues into international/national political agendas. Conclusions: The indicator system developed in this study is clear in structure, highly operational, and supported by expert consistency and authoritative evidence. Compared to international frameworks for global health diplomacy competency and domestic competency indicators for global health professionals, this system emphasizes Chinese characteristics and the diplomatic domain. It provides a basis for assessing China’s global health diplomacy competency, designing curricula and training programs, creating role profiles, and improving performance. Future efforts should focus on conducting reliability and validity testing across multiple institutions and scenarios, along with dynamic updates, to ensure its adaptability and forward-looking nature.

  Key words: Global Health Diplomacy; Competency; Indicator System; Delphi Method

  提交时间：2026-04-09

  版权声明：作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权，预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
• html

• 图表

• 陈玲玲, 李莎茜, 马玥, 田一梅, 冉建朝, 曾宪虎, 徐玲凤, 黄婷. 基于德尔菲法与层次分析法构建初级感染预防与控制专业人员能力评价体系. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202602.00019

  兰小梦, 潘杰, 赵莉. 健康示范县评价指标体系构建——基于德尔菲和层次分析法. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202407.00016

  滕佳利, 宋桂杭, 李倩, 劳颖谦, 韩优莉. 基于DIP的医保服务质量评价指标体系的构建与应用——基于德尔菲法和层次分析法. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202303.00030

  吴佩林, 陈文晶, 张思琪, 徐鹏宇, 苗艳青, 王丽丹. 基于德尔菲法的两病门诊用药保障机制评估指标体系构建. 2022. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202211.00016

  田梦怡, 郭瑜, 夏琦, 陈建增. 医疗保险基金绩效评价指标体系构建研究. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202604.00060

  黄佳慧, 张静, 王文轩, 陈若然, 杨瑾如, 龚文进. 基于德尔菲法的互联网诊疗服务质量评价体系构建. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202602.00052

  付铭, 袁萍, 路佳, 程学新. 新医科背景下规培导师胜任力评价体系研究. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202410.00012

  黄磊, 徐晓敏, 陈荃, 陈庆锟, 王岩, 胡红濮. 区域基层卫生信息化评价指标体系的构建. 2022. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202209.00017

  赵应辰, 李言飞, 王松旺, 苏雪梅. 基于德尔菲法的生物安全大数据标准体系框架构建. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202505.00031

  钟辰阳, 黄葭燕. 卫生发展援助动因分析指标体系构建. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202410.00028

• 序号	提交日期	编号	操作
  1	2026-01-13	10.12201/bmr.202604.00066V1	下载

• 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者 提交评论