张河平. 冲和-气交模型学术史综述 ——前人研究脉络与模型原创性分析. 2026. biomedRxiv.202602.00070
冲和-气交模型学术史综述 ——前人研究脉络与模型原创性分析
通讯作者: 张河平, 446914086@qq.com
DOI:10.12201/bmr.202602.00070
Chonghe-Qijiao Model: An Academic History Review ——Research Lineage and Originality Analysis
Corresponding author: zhangheping, 446914086@qq.com
-
摘要:目的:“冲和-气交”模型(又称“双轨制”模型)是对古典经络理论的系统性重构。本文旨在梳理与模型核心观点相关的已有研究,厘清学术史脉络,明确模型的原创性贡献。 方法:将模型分解为14个核心观点,逐条检索历代医家与当代学者的相关论述,从“直接提出”“概念萌芽”“间接证据”“完全空白”四个维度进行归类分析。 结果:14个核心观点中: 3个观点前人有概念提出但未深入(双轨制、五输五行质疑、经气中性) 11个观点为完全原创或原创性系统建构(经脉主干无五行、五行标签是功能便签、井穴能量来自阴阳气交、双侧点火、合穴一身二任、辨轨施治等) 结论:模型的前人基础可概括为“前人提供1%的概念和30%的证据,模型完成69%的系统建构和100%的逻辑闭环”。本综述为理解“冲和-气交”模型的学术史定位提供依据。
Abstract: Objective: The Chonghe-Qijiao model (also known as the Dual-Track model) represents a systematic reconstruction of classical meridian theory. This study aims to review existing research related to the model's core propositions, clarify the academic lineage, and identify the model's original contributions. Methods: The model was decomposed into 14 core propositions. Relevant discussions from historical medical scholars and contemporary researchers were systematically retrieved and analyzed across four dimensions: direct articulation, conceptual germination, indirect evidence, and complete absence. Results: Among the 14 core propositions: 3 propositions had been conceptually proposed by previous scholars but not developed in depth (Dual-Track system,质疑 of Five-Shu Five-Phase attributions, neutrality of meridian qi) 11 propositions are completely original or represent original systematic constructions (meridian trunk has no Five Phases, Five-Phase labels as functional tags, Jing-well point energy derived from yin-yang qijiao, bilateral ignition, He-point dual function, track-differentiation treatment, etc.) Conclusion: The model's academic foundation can be summarized as: "previous scholars provided 1% of the concepts and 30% of the evidence, while the model contributes 69% of the systematic construction and achieves 100% logical closure." This review provides a basis for understanding the academic positioning of the Chonghe-Qijiao model.
Key words: Chonghe-Qijiao model; Dual-Track system; meridian theory; Five-Shu points; divergent meridians; academic history; originality提交时间:2026-04-14
版权声明:作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权,预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。 -
图表
-
张河平. 循环与奔赴:经络的双轨逻辑 ——冲和-气交模型及其临床启示. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202602.00065
张河平. 循环与奔赴:经络的双轨逻辑 ——冲和-气交模型及其临床启示(最终修订版). 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202602.00096
李忠伟, 于本性, 刘海健, 马佳宁, 曹予萌, 赵金渤. 基于人迎寸口脉法指导五输穴针刺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变探析. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202602.00008
王致泽. 经脉网格论的临床应用:基于五行生克、中药归经与五音疗疾的信号-能量整合模型. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202603.00013
赖书兰, 邓盼盼, 李军莲. 大语言模型在生物医学学术服务平台的应用分析及启示. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202604.00083
于诗睿, 李爱花, 林紫洛, 陈逸菲, 唐小利. 基于主题模型的科技文献主题演化分析方法优化研究综述. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202305.00016
王致泽. 经脉信号理论模型:基于《黄帝内经》与现代科研的统一医学理论. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202603.00037
王致泽. 经脉网格论:基于信号-能量整合模型的经络实质新解. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202603.00009
刘燕, 张潇潇, 侯丽. 面向知识服务系统的学术知识图谱构建与应用研究. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202402.00015
殷彩明, 袁永旭, 王涟, 孙一凡, 陈俊冶. *国内社区养老服务热点分析—基于LDA模型与生命周期理论. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202406.00005
-
序号 提交日期 编号 操作 1 2026-02-15 10.12201/bmr.202602.00070V1
下载 -
-
公开评论 匿名评论 仅发给作者
引用格式
访问统计
- 阅读量:29
- 下载量: 0
- 评论数:0

登录
注册




京公网安备