通讯作者: 桑梅洁, sangmeijie@hebcm.edu.cn

DOI：10.12201/bmr.202512.00049

Adult health information overload assessment tool:a scoping review

• 摘要：目的 对成年人健康信息过载评估工具进行范围综述,分析工具的种类、性能、特点等,为此类评估工具的选择提供参考。方法 系统检索中国知网、万方、维普数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase等中英文数据库,检索时间为建库至2025年8月26日。提取文献和评估工具的基本信息,将检索结果进行规范化报告。结果 共纳入19篇文献,包含22个成年人健康信息过载评估工具。均为主观评估工具,信度多采用内部一致性信度检验,效度多采用结构效度检验。均为单维度测量。结论 当前健康信息过载评估工具信度良好,部分工具的效度验证以及开发验证方法学仍需完善。未来应推动跨学科合作,建立统一的健康信息过载定义和维度体系,开发普适性核心量表+特异性模块的评估体系,结合客观测量技术,加强本土化工具开发及人群特异性研究,以提高评估的精准性和临床适用性。

  关键词： 健康信息过载; 评估工具; 范围综述

   

  Abstract: Objective To review the assessment tools for adult health information overload, analyze the types, performance and characteristics of these tools, and provide reference for the selection of such assessment tools. Methods: The Chinese and English databases of CNKI, Wanfang,VIP, CBM, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from the establishment of the database to August 26, 2025. The basic information of literature and assessment tools was extracted, and the search results were standardized and reported. Results A total of 19 articles were included, including 22 assessment tools for adult health information overload. All of them were subjective assessment tools. The reliability was mostly tested by internal consistency reliability, and the validity was mostly tested by construct validity. All were single-dimension measurements. Conclusion The current health information overload assessment tools have good reliability, but the validity verification of some tools and the methodology of development and validation still need to be improved. In the future, interdisciplinary cooperation should be promoted, a unified definition and dimension system of health information overload should be established, an evaluation system of universal core scale + specific module should be developed, and the development of localized tools and population-specific research should be strengthened in combination with objective measurement techniques to improve the accuracy and clinical applicability of the assessment.

  Key words: health information overload; Assessment tools; Review of scope

  提交时间：2025-12-17

  版权声明：作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权，预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
• html

• 图表

• 孙艺铭, 李童童, 段棣飞. 老年人数字健康素养评估工具的范围综述. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202408.00062

  王凌梦, 朱瑞, 侯文杰, 张陈陈, 郭星, 王辅之. 健康焦虑与健康信息搜寻行为影响机制的研究综述. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202408.00056

  施呈昊, 屠馨怡, 史佳伟, 陈红爽, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 大语言模型在临床实践中应用的范围综述. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202406.00001

  郑杰媚, 邱小芩, 韦吉思, 丘欣雨, 刘娜, 陈思帆. 慢性心力衰竭患者症状群的范围综述. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202501.00046

  汪亚男, 徐霞艳, 朱月兰. “互联网＋护理服务”质量管理评价指标研究的范围综述. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202407.00067

  李芳凤, 徐莉霞, 谢春, 刘洋, 龙威彪. 卒中后上肢功能障碍评估工具的研究进展. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202503.00001

  章小童, 杨帆, 王晓瑜, 张书涵. 健康信息搜索系统交互评估理论模型构建研究. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202504.00036

  王竞波, 曾云光, 祝贺, 陈英耀. 基本公共卫生服务项目绩效评价：回顾与思考. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202512.00001

  袁家琪, 樊志磊, 郑炆苅, 魏艳, 陈英耀. 国外健康影响评估的制度化现状及对我国的启示. 2022. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202203.00009

  刘喜文, 杜文豪, 王诗淇, 张军亮, 雒保军. 基于潜类别分析的老年人健康分类与健康信息服务优化研究. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202404.00013

• 序号	提交日期	编号	操作
  1	2025-09-29	10.12201/bmr.202512.00049V1	下载

• 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者 提交评论