成青鉴, He Yuyuan, Cao Junsheng, Wang Jianjun. Comparison of therapeutic effects of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation and high ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein in the treatment of varicose veins of lower limbs and analysis of recurrence factors. 2026. biomedRxiv.202602.00026
Comparison of therapeutic effects of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation and high ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein in the treatment of varicose veins of lower limbs and analysis of recurrence factors
Corresponding author: 成青鉴, qfqsjq@163.com
DOI: 10.12201/bmr.202602.00026
-
Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this research is to assess the clinical effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus high ligation and stripping (HL/S) in the management of lower extremity varicose veins (LEVV), and to explore the factors contributing to recurrence using SHAP analysis. Methods: A total of 240 LEVV patients admitted to our hospital between December 2023 and December 2024 were recruited and allocated into two cohorts: the RFA group (n = 120) and the HL/S group (n = 120). The two groups were compared with respect to surgery-related parameters, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, coagulation indices after surgery, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), Venous Appearance and Quality of Life Questionnaire (VAVQ) scores, as well as the incidence of complications and recurrence at 12 months following the operation. Results: Compared with the HL/S group, the RFA group exhibited notably less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation duration, and reduced hospital stay (P<0.05). Postoperative VAS scores were lower in the RFA group than in the HL/S group, indicating milder postoperative pain. No significant differences were observed in the levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and fibrinogen (FIB) between the two groups preoperatively; however, the RFA group had substantially lower PAI-1 and FIB levels on the 3rd postoperative day. At 6 months after surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in VCSS scores between the two groups, but at 12 months, the VCSS of the RFA group was significantly lower than that of the HL/S group (P<0.05). Both groups showed marked improvements in VAVQ scores after surgery, with no significant intergroup difference (P>0.05). The total complication rate in the RFA group was 10.83%, which was significantly lower than the 30.83% in the HL/S group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in recurrence rates between the two groups at 6 and 9 months postoperatively; however, at 12 months, the recurrence rate of the RFA group was 11.77%, significantly lower than the 25.0% in the HL/S group (P<0.05). SHAP analysis revealed the top five key variables affecting recurrence risk: (1) Coagulation dysfunction: Impaired coagulation status was associated with an elevated recurrence risk; (2) Body Mass Index (BMI): Higher BMI correlated with increased recurrence risk; (3) Age: Patients younger than 45 years had a lower recurrence risk, while those older than 60 years faced a higher risk; (4) Great saphenous vein diameter: A vein diameter exceeding 9mm heightened the recurrence risk; (5) CEAP classification: Patients with CEAP C4-C5 (moderate-risk group) had a higher recurrence risk compared to those with lower classifications. Conclusion: In the treatment of LEVV, RFA is more effective than HL/S. It remarkably enhances clinical outcomes, reduces the incidence of complications, and lowers the recurrence rate. Strengthening preoperative assessments and optimizing postoperative rehabilitation protocols can further help mitigate the risk of recurrence.
Key words: varicose; veins of; lower limbs, radiofrequency; ablation, high; ligation and; stripping, SHAP; analysis, recurrenceSubmit time: 8 February 2026
Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted biomedRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. -
图表
-
The comparison in therapeutic efficacy between modified outer sleeve catheter stripping surgery and intracavitary laser treatment for primary great saphenous varicose vein. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202507.00078
xie haibo. Clinical Experience in Treating Recurrence after Radiofrequency Ablation for Premature Ventricular Contractions Based on the Theory of Deficiency and Obstruction. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202511.00080
gongwenbo. Analysis of Chronic Venous Edema of Lower Limbs Based on “Earth Attains Smoothness through Wood”. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202603.00014
wuzetao. Efficacy Analysis of Two Different Endovascular Thrombectomy Approaches for Treating Early-Stage Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202506.00037
jianggongtao. Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Needle Knife Therapy Guided by Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Residual Low Back Pain after Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture Surgery. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202511.00052
周丽娜, PU yuanfang. Factors Influencing Early-Stage Seromuscular Layer Lesions in Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Adenomyosis. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202602.00004
chen yi jin, hu li fen, guo xue min, lu jia ying. Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Different Numbers of Endoscopic Multi-Band Ligation in the Treatment of Grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ Internal Hemorrhoids. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202603.00059
sunjinhuan, wuxiaofei, zhangyuanyuan, guboyu, guofulin. Meta-analysis of Comparison between the Effects of Fenestration and Curettage on Jaw Cyst.. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202408.00021
guolianmei, sunxiaohong, zhangzhe, tianye. Construction of a Prediction Model for Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Hemorrhagic Stroke Based on Machine Learning. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202510.00023
ZHOU HONG, WANG XV DONG, XIE SI YI, LIU MEI LING, GAO TIAN LIN, LI MING, CAO SHU XING, HAO HUI YAO, SONG YONG ZHOU. Correlation analysis of lower limb contrast changes and Vasoactive factors levels in diabetic foot rabbit model. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202603.00047
-
ID Submit time Number Download 1 2026-01-22 10.12201/bmr.202602.00026V1
Download -
-
Public Anonymous To author only
Get Citation
Article Metrics
- Read: 161
- Download: 1
- Comment: 0

Login
Register




京公网安备