• 国家药监局综合司 国家卫生健康委办公厅
  • 国家药监局综合司 国家卫生健康委办公厅

A Comparative Analysis of Prenatal Screening Choices: ART versus Natural Conception

Corresponding author: ZHAO Yueshu, zyswr@163.com
DOI: 10.12201/bmr.202512.00015
Statement: This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. It reports new research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
  •  

    Abstract: Background: In clinical practice, women with pregnancies achieved through Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) often face confusion regarding the choice of prenatal screening methods. There is ongoing clinical debate on whether ART pregnancies warrant a different prenatal screening pathway compared to naturally conceived pregnancies and how to determine the optimal strategy.Objective To analyze the differences in prenatal screening methods, high-risk rates of various screening methods such as nuchal translucency (NT), maternal serum screening (MSS, Downs screening, Downs test), and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), and the prenatal diagnosis rates between ART pregnant women and natural pregnant women. This is to provide more accurate and efficient prenatal screening plans for ART pregnant women.Methods A total of 42,332 singleton pregnant women who delivered at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2021 to December 2024 were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into the ART pregnancy group (1,858 cases) and the natural pregnancy group (40,474 cases) based on the mode of conception. The examination rates of NT, Downs screening, and NIPT, as well as the high-risk rates and prenatal diagnosis rates of the two groups of pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed. The differences between the two groups were compared using the χ2 test or Fishers exact probability method, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.Results The NT examination rate in the ART group (88.43%) was significantly higher than that in the natural pregnancy group (82.30%). Among non-elderly women, the NIPT examination rate in the ART group (37.19%) was significantly higher than that in the natural pregnancy group (20.14%), while the Downs screening examination rate was significantly lower (64.21% vs. 76.83%). Among elderly women, the NIPT examination rate in the ART group (42.79%) was also significantly higher than that in the natural pregnancy group (30.72%). The NT thickening rate, high-risk rate of Downs screening, and high-risk rate of NIPT in the ART group were 0.79%, 6.93%, and 1.01%, respectively, while those in the natural pregnancy group were 0.60%, 7.44%, and 0.97%, respectively. Comparisons between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences.Conclusion Women with ART pregnancies demonstrate a greater emphasis on prenatal screening, opting for more precise and efficient screening methods and showing heightened concern for offspring safety. Furthermore, the positive rate of prenatal screening in the ART group was not significantly increased, indicating that ART technology itself does not elevate the risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

    Key words: ART; NT; Maternal; Serum Screening; NIPT

    Submit time: 4 December 2025

    Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted biomedRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • 图表

  • LU Ming, ZHONG Peisong, REN Honglei, YIN Fanglan. Recent Advances in Precision-Based Early Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202512.00013

    zhuyiyang, luwenhao. Study on the Use of cfDNA from Blastocoel Fluid for Embryo Aneuploidy Screening. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202507.00036

    SiWei, XuTing, LinJiayue, Cao Wenting, ZhuAiyong. A review of artificial intelligence technology in the screening of cognitive impairment. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202407.00048

    yangxiaoyan. Predictive Value of First-Trimester Serological Markers PAPP-A and Free-hCGβ Combined with Gestational Weight Gain for Fetal Growth Restriction
    ????????????? Yang Wenying1? Yang Xiaoyan▲. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202505.00018

    He Yushan, Wang Bingsen, Gao Dongping. Research Progress on the Value of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in the Early Screening of Autism Spectrum Disorder. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202512.00058

    Screening and Bioinformatics Analysis of Differentially Expressed miRNAs in Pediatric Fulminant Myocarditis. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202503.00064

    Sun Hua-jun, Du Yue. Analysis on the Path of Supply Selection of Maternal and Child Public Health Service Items. 2022. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202201.00002

    沈卓, zhaoying, GaoTao. Research advances of natural killer cells at the maternal-fetal interface. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202505.00023

    Zhou Zhou, Xuan Zhang, Huimin Fan, Mengxue Zhou, Xianliang Wang. Analysis of the mechanism of acute hypotension: bioinformatics-driven target screening and pathway mining. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202507.00047

    MAO Qian, luo qingqing. Clinical characteristics of premature rupture of membranes complicated with histological chorioamnionitis. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202504.00048

  • ID Submit time Number Download
    1 2025-10-21

    10.12201/bmr.202512.00015V1

    Download
  • Public  Anonymous  To author only

Get Citation

ZHAO Yueshu, Wang rui, Liu Ling, Li jianing, Feng Chunyu, Wang Suzhen. A Comparative Analysis of Prenatal Screening Choices: ART versus Natural Conception. 2025. biomedRxiv.202512.00015

Article Metrics

  • Read: 101
  • Download: 0
  • Comment: 0

Email This Article

User name:
Email:*请输入正确邮箱
Code:*验证码错误