通讯作者: 何平, phe@pku.edu.cn

DOI：10.12201/bmr.202006.00011

Policy translation of health policy and systems research in China

• 摘要：目的：描述我国卫生政策与体系研究政策转化情况，分析影响卫生政策转化的主要因素。方法：本研究利用问卷调查、关键人物访谈中有关政策转化的指标，从环境因素、研究者因素、政策转化过程因素及政策制定者因素四个维度，对我国的卫生政策与体系研究政策转化情况进行评估。结果：2015至2017年间，65.79%的研究机构认为我国循证决策文化改善，卫生政策与体系研究需求增加，超过半数的研究者认为相关研究资助情况改善。2017年，平均每所研究机构产出10.84篇英文文章、52.79篇中文文章、11.39篇研究报告及14.39篇会议论文，政策简报的数量仅为4.53篇。卫生部门是研究成果的主要传播对象。对阻碍政策转化的因素进行评分，研究机构与政策制定者之间缺乏有效的沟通以及政策建议的可行性方面评分最高。结论：整体来说，我国卫生政策与体系研究的政策转化情况有所改善，但尚待规范的循证决策过程，不够畅通的沟通渠道，不恰当的成果传播形式及有限的卫生政策与体系研究能力仍是政策转化过程中关键的阻碍因素。

  关键词： 卫生政策; 卫生体系; 研究; 循证决策

   

  Abstract: Objective: To describe the policy translation of health policy and systems research in China and analyze the main factors affecting the policy translation. Methods: This study evaluated the translation of Chinas health policy and systems research from four dimensions, including environmental factors, researcher-side factors, policy translation process factors and policymaker-side factors, using the indicators related to policy translation in the questionnaire and the key informant interview. Results: 65.79% of research institutions thought that Chinas evidence-based decision-making culture had improved, and the demand for health policy and systems research had increased during 2015 to 2017. More than half of researchers thought that the funding for related research had improved during that time. In 2017, research institutions produced an average of 10.84 English articles, 52.79 Chinese articles, 11.39 research reports and 14.39 conference papers, while the average number of policy briefs was only 4.53 per institution. The health agency was the main audience of research. Lacking effective communication between research institutions and policymakers and feasibility of policy recommendations were rated highest on factors that hindered policy translation. Conclusion: On the whole, policy translation of health policy and systems research in China has been improved, but the incomplete evidence-based decision-making process, insufficient communication channels, inappropriate results dissemination and limited research capacity are still the key obstacles in the policy translation process.

  Key words: Health Policy; Health systems; Research; Evidence-based decision-making

  提交时间：2020-12-15

  版权声明：作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权，预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
• html

• 图表

• 石振宇, 加焱冰, 袁蓓蓓, 孟庆跃, 何平. 我国卫生政策与体系研究文献计量分析. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202006.00012

  孟庆跃. 卫生政策与体系研究能力述评. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202006.00009

  加焱冰, 石振宇, 何平, 孟庆跃. 我国卫生政策与体系研究人力资源现状分析. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202006.00008

  加焱冰, 石振宇, 袁蓓蓓, 徐进, 孟庆跃, 何平. 我国卫生政策与体系研究科研项目及经费现状分析. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202006.00010

  裴晨阳, 胡琳琳, 刘远立. 我国老年健康服务政策的发展演变与未来建议. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202007.00026

  赵君, 丁雪, 陈永超, 王芳. 我国部分地区妇幼健康分级服务政策实践分析. 2021. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202012.00016

  周旭, 窦川川, 彭咏梅, 刘海舟, 王艳萍, 吴勇奇, 朱卫丰. 循证医学专业英语语料库建设研究. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202005.00004

  高奇隆, 魏景明, 董恒进. 浙江省职工医保个人账户购买商业健康险政策的效果与原因分析——基于省内六医保统筹地的关键知情人访谈. 2021. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202010.00842

  邹阳, 董祥. 我国图书馆健康服务研究--基于CiteSpace的可视化分析. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202008.00013

  景丽伟, 侯清华, 刘志, 孙书彦, 黄石松. 我国老龄健康公平社会决定因素分析及对策. 2020. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202003.00305

• 序号	提交日期	编号	操作
  1	2020-06-09	bmr.202006.00011V1	下载

• 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者 提交评论