通讯作者: 韩优莉, hanyouli@ccmu.edu.cn

DOI：10.12201/bmr.202604.00108

Research on the construction of a high-quality development evaluation index system for tertiary public hospitals within a region: a case study of municipal hospitals in Beijing

• 摘要：目的：以北京市市属医院为例,构建区域内三级公立医院高质量发展评价指标体系,为公立医院高质量发展评价和动态调整提供依据。方法：2025年9-12月,通过文献研究与政策梳理,结合北京市市属医院高质量发展实际情况,拟定评价指标体系,采用2轮德尔菲法和层次分析法构建评价体系并确定指标权重。结果：研究邀请了18名专家,第一轮咨询回收率94.44%、第二轮咨询回收率100%,专家权威系数0.80。评价体系包括6个一级指标、11个二级指标和42个三级指标。一级指标为新体系,新趋势,新效能,新动力,新理念与党的领导。各项一级指标的权重相同。结论：本研究所构建的指标体系具有良好的科学性与可行性,适用于北京市市属医院高质量发展水平的综合评估,能够为区域内三级公立医院高质量发展评价、相关管理决策与政策优化提供参考依据。

  关键词： 医院评价; 高质量发展; 指标体系; 

   

  Abstract: Objective: To inform the evaluation and dynamic adjustment of high-quality development in public hospitals, this study constructs an evaluation index system for the high-quality development of regional tertiary public hospitals, using Beijing municipal hospitals as a case. Methods: This study was conducted from September to December 2025. A draft indicator system was developed from literature review, policy analysis, and the practical context of high-quality development in Beijing municipal hospitals, which was subsequently refined and weighted using a combination of the two-round Delphi method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Results: A total of 18 experts were invited to participate in this study. The expert engagement rate was 94.44% in the first round and 100% in the second round, reflecting a high level of participation and interest. The expert authority coefficient was 0.80. The final evaluation system consists of 6 first-level indicators, 11 second-level indicators, and 42 third-level indicators. The first-level indicators are: new system, new trend, new efficiency, new power, new concept, and party leadership, each with equal weight. Conclusion: The evaluation indicator system established in this research demonstrates both strong scientific validity and practical feasibility. It is applicable for comprehensively assessing the high-quality development level of municipal hospitals in Beijing and may serve as a reference for evaluating high-quality development in tertiary public hospitals across the region, as well as for supporting related management decisions and policy refinement.

  Key words: hospital; evaluation, high-quality; development, indicator; system

  提交时间：2026-04-13

  版权声明：作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权，预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
• html

• 图表

• 赵宁, 孙力光, 高广颖, 韩优莉, 杨佳. 基于灰色综合评价法的北京市医疗保障高质量发展指标体系评价实证研究. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202306.00011

  陈心足. 公立医院“人科院”高质量融合发展的实践与创新. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202604.00048

  王文文, 侯居旺, 欧阳恒丽, 李之淳, 孙玉凤. 公立医院高质量发展背景下口腔门诊费用结构研究. 2026. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202604.00119

  刘颖, 周航, 曹琦. 公立医院高质量发展背景下平台型领导对护士创新行为影响研究. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202404.00025

  潘林, 刘冀. 高质量发展下公立医院全成本核算精细化管理实践. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202511.00026

  牟艺帆, 孙嘉颖, 罗金萍, 张宝轩, 耿铭慧, 尹文强, 陈钟鸣, 马东平. 高质量发展背景下我国长江经济带中医医院运营效率研究. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202502.00054

  刘兰芳, 姚岚. 基层卫生健康事业高质量发展内涵与路径分析. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202402.00005

  姚强, 吴璇, 郭冰清, 程兆辉, 高娟. 高质量发展背景下卫生系统绩效主观测度及影响因素研究——基于CSS2015-2021调查的实证分析. 2024. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202407.00015

  郝思凯. 家庭医生签约服务政策的变迁逻辑与高质量发展路径研究——基于政策整合的分析框架. 2025. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202505.00015

  滕佳利, 宋桂杭, 李倩, 劳颖谦, 韩优莉. 基于DIP的医保服务质量评价指标体系的构建与应用——基于德尔菲法和层次分析法. 2023. doi: 10.12201/bmr.202303.00030

• 序号	提交日期	编号	操作
  2	2026-03-26	10.12201/bmr.202604.00108V2	下载
  1	2026-03-24	10.12201/bmr.202604.00108V1	下载

• 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者 提交评论